CFA Connect
 
Home > News > Neighbourhood Safer Places

Neighbourhood Safer Places

Posted by Bushfires Portfolio CFA Member
Thursday, 09 February 2012

Neighbourhood Safer Places - Places of Last Resort are regarded as a very important element of the State’s Bushfire Safety Policy Framework, and were first identified in the Victorian Bushfire Royal Commission’s (VBRC) interim and final reports.

In responding to the recommendations, the State has developed a model for Neighbourhood Safer Places, which play a critical role as a place of last resort for those whose bushfire survival plan has been interrupted or failed.

Local government, the Municipal Association of Victoria (MAV) and CFA have developed and maintained an essential partnership to establish Neighbourhood Safer Places. These strong and effective relationships, supported by communication at all levels, have put in place an effective business system and have been critical to establishing Neighbourhood Safer Places.

A significant milestone has been achieved with over 220 Neighbourhood Safer Places now designated around Victoria. In choosing these sites, local municipal committees and CFA assessed approximately 800 sites that local government considered for potential Neighbourhood Safer Places.

CFA assessments included determining the vegetation type, assessing the vegetation fuel loads and the potential radiant heat impact on the site. CFA gave these assessments to local government, who then decided whether the sites were suitable based on the combined advice from CFA and municipal emergency management committees.

Director of Community Safety, Terry Hayes, said it is important to understand Neighbourhood Safer Places are seen as a shelter option in high-risk areas.

“By definition, high-risk areas have limitations and need alternative options such as Neighbourhood Safer Places. Even as places of last resort, it is important to note that sites for Neighbourhood Safer Places can also be difficult to locate because of the very nature of the high-risk area.

“Whilst 800 assessments point to a significant volume of work, they also reinforce to us that high-risk areas have limited safety options. These limitations need to be understood by the community to ensure a strong focus on leaving early on days of high bushfire risk,” Terry added.

About Neighbourhood Safer Places

Neighbourhood Safer Places are places of last resort when all other plans have failed. They are not places to relocate to when leaving early. They may provide some protection from direct flame contact and radiant heat during a bushfire.

Neighbourhood Safer Places may still be subject to extreme conditions such as; heat, high winds, ember attack, radiant heat, smoke and ash and they do not guarantee safety. There are limited facilities and support or services may not be provided.

Please note that not every town has a Neighbourhood Safer Place – communities are advised to identify other community or privately arranged shelter options in the area as well.

Designated Neighbourhood Safer Places are listed here.

Location:
Categories:
Last modified on Monday, 30 July 2012 16:55
Read 1139 times
Comments (3)Add Comment
Geoff Schmidt
...
written by Geoff Schmidt, February 09, 2012
I'm a bit concerned by the title - CFA Neighbourhood Safer Places. Neighourhood safer places are not owned, controlled or managed by the CFA. They are a municipal responsibility; CFA just assess them against the criteria.

Issues with NSPs should be raised by residents/locals with the local council, not with the CFA.

And while I'm having a whinge, we need to change the name altogether to just be "places of last resort". While they retain the name of NSPs, residents will continue to use them as fire plan "A" despite all the contrary advice from us and elsewhere.
Bushfires Portfolio
...
written by Bushfires Portfolio , February 10, 2012
Hi Geoff,

Thanks for your feedback - and you are correct.

I have deleted 'CFA' and referenced NPSs as places of last resort in the first instance.

Thanks



Jay Martin
...
written by Jay Martin, February 15, 2012
I agree with Geoff, a change of name is definitely in order with NSP's. "KISS" is the modus operandi here I believe...."place of last resort" coupled with a definitive education campaign in locations where they may exist......

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy